Two original 1892 scenes of the merciful ogress meeting the princesses and concealing them from her man-eating son
Historical illustration

Two original 1892 scenes of the merciful ogress meeting the princesses and concealing them from her man-eating son

Unidentified artist; published in Charles Swynnerton, Indian Nights’ Entertainment, London: Elliot Stock, 1892, p. 335. Original collective credit: illustrations by native hands. Cornell University Library scan. · Historical work: expired copyright assessment for local compendium · Image source

The upper scene shows the tall ogress with the two abandoned princesses; the lower scene shows her facing her returning son. The nearby narrative explains her fly transformation and concealment. The artist’s horned or bulky forms belong to this particular illustration, rather than anatomy supplied by the tale.

Overview

Two young princesses abandoned in the wilderness find a castle occupied by a very tall old woman. Swynnerton identifies her as an ogress but stresses her compassion. She warns that her son eats human beings and will devour them when he returns. Responding to their plea for concealment, she turns both children into flies and pins them to the wall.

Her son returns roaring that he smells human flesh and blood. She denies that anyone is present besides the two of them, and he eats hog’s flesh, drinks wine and falls asleep. After he leaves in the morning, she removes the pins and restores the sisters to their human shapes. She sends them away quickly, explaining that their presence could get her into trouble as well.

The sisters survive the transformation and continue into the forest; the tale later follows their separation, marriage, persecution and reunion. Neither ogress nor son returns in that ending. Her mercy coexists with her stated monstrous identity and the danger posed by her household. The text does not name her, specify how the spell is spoken or make the pins kill the children. The illustration’s particular bodily design is not treated as additional textual anatomy, and the helpful mother is not merged with the separate ghoul spouses in The Princess and the Ogres.

Ogress who changes endangered children into fliesSpecific historical narrative
01

Origins & earliest records

Upper Indus Panjabi tales in Charles Swynnerton’s English collection

02

Records & interpretation

Complete story and ending read; critical printed pages visually checked.

Selected bibliography

Documented works and useful reading. This is not a list of every appearance.

  1. 01

    Indian Nights’ Entertainment; or, Folk-Tales from the Upper Indus

    LXXXI, Lâl Bâdshâh, the Red King; or, The Two Little Princesses, pp.330–342; ogress episode pp.334–336

Family, evolution & connections

Primary records and illustrations

Direct primary record

Charles Swynnerton, Indian Nights’ Entertainment (1892)

1892 edition. LXXXI, Lâl Bâdshâh, the Red King; or, The Two Little Princesses, pp.330–342; ogress episode pp.334–336

Complete swynnerton1892-ch81.txt read and retained. Printed43/335/336 actually viewed in sourcePNG images; no revived parrot or fatal fly-transformation inferred.

Inspect the digitized plate · Source collection manifest

References

Sources supporting this profile. Linked pages have their own scope and editorial standards.

  1. Historical primary English translationCornell scan of Swynnerton (1892), LXXXI, Lâl Bâdshâh, the Red King; or, The Two Little Princesses, pp.330–342; ogress episode pp.334–336Research access: 2026-10-05

Image credits

Historical illustration

Two original 1892 scenes of the merciful ogress meeting the princesses and concealing them from her man-eating son

Unidentified artist; published in Charles Swynnerton, Indian Nights’ Entertainment, London: Elliot Stock, 1892, p. 335. Original collective credit: illustrations by native hands. Cornell University Library scan. · Historical work: expired copyright assessment for local compendium · Image source

The upper scene shows the tall ogress with the two abandoned princesses; the lower scene shows her facing her returning son. The nearby narrative explains her fly transformation and concealment. The artist’s horned or bulky forms belong to this particular illustration, rather than anatomy supplied by the tale.

FT·1976 · RESEARCH EDITION 01Back to top ↑