A sourced illustration has not yet been added. This gap is included in the coverage record.

Overview

The Izingogo live in their own settlements, walk on all fours and have tails, but speak like human beings. Appendix B connects their animal designation with choosing to live apart from other people and eating human flesh. Callaway’s editorial introduction calls them fabulous animals and compares them with degraded humanity; that characterization is not adopted as an assertion about an actual community. Their play includes competitive leaping at a riverbank, and the contributed explanation attributes their lightness to eating red earth.

A man sent by his mother-in-law to obtain an ingogo liver imitates their four-footed movement and joins them. The elders accept him, but the children recognize human-looking hair, eyes, ears and nostrils and distrust him. They refuse to leave their grandmother alone with him, drawing the elders’ anger when they have not gathered firewood. After a day hunting with the company, the impostor feigns stomach pain. On the next day he sends the children for water in a leaking vessel, kills the elderly grandmother left behind and takes her liver and a friction-fire apparatus. Returning at sunset, the children see dried blood along the path and discover her body in the long, dim house. Their warning proves correct.

The beings pursue rapidly, following blood from the stolen liver and recovering speed whenever they sight him. Twice he sets grass alight with the stolen apparatus, and they halt because they fear fire. They finally turn back when he reaches inhabited villages. At their own home they cook and eat their grandmother, saying it will prevent their death. The man delivers the liver to his mother-in-law. The narrated belief behind that final meal is retained as their speech, rather than a claim about health or longevity.

Appendix B adds that the young Izingogo’s discernment exceeds that of their elders: even punishment does not make them withdraw their suspicion. It also describes testing an apparent newcomer by asking him to leap with the company; inability to leap is grounds to reject his claim to be an ingogo. The closing statement of four-footed movement, tails and human speech is followed on the facing text by Lydia’s name. These supplementary details are kept distinct from the main pursuit, whose renewed speed is likened to flying when the fugitives are sighted rather than described as literal winged flight.

Four-footed gaitTails with human speechRed-earth leaping accountChildren detect impostorRapid pursuitFear of grass fires
01

Origins & earliest records

Lydia (Umkasetemba) is credited at the main narrative’s conclusion, printed p. 175. Appendix B’s closing contributed passage on p. 178 explicitly bears Lydia’s name. Callaway’s introductory comparison and subsequent baboon-origin narratives are separate editorial material and separately credited accounts.

02

Records & interpretation

Complete Ugungqu-kubantwana and Appendix B, printed pp. 170–178, including the narrated resolution.

In the literature

“was greater than that of the older ones”
Henry Callaway, translator/editor; appendixB credited to Lydia on printed p.178 · Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus, Volume I
AppendixB, printed p.177 · Henry Callaway

The children’s discernment exceeds adults’ when identifying the human impostor.

Selected bibliography

Documented works and useful reading. This is not a list of every appearance.

  1. 01

    Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus

    Ugungqu-kubantwana and Appendix B, pp. 170–178; contributor and editorial roles kept separate.

  2. 02

    Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus, Volume I — Ugungqu-kubantwana and appendices

    Henry Callaway, Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus, Volume I, Springvale, Natal: John A.Blair1868; selected bilingual Princeton scan. Complete main Ugungqu-kubantwana164–175 and appendicesA176/B177–178 read. Main175 credits Lydia(Umkasetemba); appendixA176 credits Lydia; appendixB credited to Lydia on printed p.178.

Family & connections

A source-supported family tree or inspiration record has not yet been compiled for this profile. Related reading below indicates a connection in subject matter, not a proven lineage or creative influence.

Located primary passages

Specific passages supporting details in this entry, grouped by their published witness.

Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus

Henry Callaway, Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus, Volume I, Springvale, Natal: John A.Blair1868; selected bilingual Princeton scan. Complete main Ugungqu-kubantwana164–175 and appendicesA176/B177–178 read. Main175 credits Lydia(Umkasetemba); appendixA176 credits Lydia; appendixB credited to Lydia on printed p.178.

  1. The rescued grandmother retaliates by demanding an ingogo’s liver. Her son-in-law imitates the creatures’ quadrupedal movement and gains the adults’ acceptance, but the young recognise human features and refuse to abandon their grandmother. He joins a hunt, then claims illness and sends the young for water in a leaking vessel, leaving him free to kill their grandmother and take her liver.

    Ugungqu-kubantwana, printed pp.170–172

  2. The young discover blood and the dead grandmother, alert the adults, and the group pursues the man along his bloody trail. He escapes through grass fires and proximity to human villages. The Izingogo return, cook and eat the grandmother, saying this will prevent their own deaths, while the man delivers her liver home.

    Ugungqu-kubantwana, printed pp.173–175; note16

  3. The appendix describes beings derived from humans through living apart, going on all fours with tails but speaking like people. Their children discern the human impostor more accurately than adults, even when punished. Leaping tests distinguish group members and human imitators.

    AppendixB, The Izingogo, printed pp.177–178

The human visitor is the killer and impersonator here. The youngest creatures’ suspicion is justified, and the adult communal grandmother is not automatically each individual’s biological mother. Ritual or medicinal interpretation in note16 is editorial; no efficacy asserted. Their pursuit responds to an actual murder, and the slain grandmother is not restored. Callaway’s introductory degeneration/baboon language and Gulliver comparison are editorial interpretations, not human evolutionary science. Detailed bodily tests and preparation instructions are not reproduced. Subsequent baboon-origin accounts have their own named contributors and are not assigned here.

References

Sources supporting this profile. Linked pages have their own scope and editorial standards.

  1. Digitized bilingual collected account with English translationHenry Callaway — Ugungqu-kubantwana and Appendix BResearch access: 2026-10-05

Image credits

A sourced illustration has not yet been added. This gap is included in the coverage record.

FT·3067 · RESEARCH EDITION 01Back to top ↑